Search

 

Hand-held Dynamometer Positioning Impacts Discomfort During Quadriceps Strength Testing: A Validity and Reliability Study.   

Authors: Hansen EH, McCartney CN, Sweeney RS, Palimenio MR, Grindstaff TL  

A belt-stabilized hand-held dynamometer (HHD) offers the ability to quantify quadriceps muscle strength in a clinical environment, but a limitation is participant discomfort at the interface between the HHD and the tibia. The purpose of this study was to quantify the level of discomfort associated with a modified belt-stabilized HHD configuration compared to a standard belt-stabilized configuration and an isokinetic dynamometer. The secondary purpose of this study was to determine the validity and reliability of a modified configuration used to measure quadriceps strength compared to the “gold-standard” isokinetic dynamometer.  The isokinetic dynamometer configuration resulted in the least discomfort (p< .01) and the modified configuration was more comfortable than the standard configuration (p= .003). There was a significant correlation between measures from the isokinetic dynamometer and the standard configuration (r=.87) and modified configuration (r=.93). Within-session intrarater reliability was good for both the standard configuration (ICC2,1=0.93) and modified configuration (ICC2,1=0.93) conditions.  Therefore, the authors concluded that the use of the modified belt-stabilized HHD configuration where the HHD was interfaced with the leg of a table offers a more comfortable alternative to obtain isometric quadriceps strength measures in a clinical environment. This configuration is also a valid and reliable alternative to the “gold standard” isokinetic dynamometer when testing isometric quadriceps strength at 90° of knee flexion. 

Abstract  |  Full Article (subscribers only)  |  Purchase Article